Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlational analyses

From: Quantifying compensatory strategies in adults with and without diagnosed autism

 

1

2

3

4

5

Overall compensation (1)

.73***

.59***

.55***

.57***

Shallow compensation (2)

 

.13

.16

.28**

Deep compensation (3)

  

.13

.18

Masking (4)

   

.15

Accommodation (5)

    

Autistic traits

.26**

.41***

.01

.07

.05

Highest education level

.22*

.25**

.02

.09

.18*

Sex (1 = female, 0 = male)a

− .04

− .11

.03

.07

− .10

Diagnosis (1 = diagnosed, 0 = non-diagnosed)a

.21*

.30**

.13

− .03

.03

Age at diagnosisb

.11

.04

− .08

.19

.22

  1. Highest education level was used as a proxy IQ measure. Greater scores reflect higher education level/greater autistic traits/more self-reported strategies. Analyses were computed using both raw and standardised strategy scores (see the “Methods” section). A similar pattern of results was found; therefore, analyses using raw scores are reported (see Additional file 1 for analyses using standardised scores). *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. aPoint-biserial correlations. bDiagnosed group only (n = 58)