Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical classification performance, comparison of original and Complex Social Geopref tests

From: The geometric preference subtype in ASD: identifying a consistent, early-emerging phenomenon through eye tracking

69% Geo threshold

All available subjects

N = 444

All available subjects

N = 227

Screening referred subjects only

N = 122

True positive = ASD only

Original GeoPref test (2016)

Complex Social GeoPref test

Complex Social GeoPref test

True positive

35

14

10

False negative

117

62

36

False positive

4

4

3

True negative

288

147

73

Sensitivity (%)

23

18

22

Specificity (%)

99

97

96

Positive predictive value (%)

90

78

77

Negative predictivevalue (%)

71

70

67

Area under ROC curve

.71

.74

.73