Skip to main content

Table 2 Generalized linear mixed effects regressions predicting average UM and UH relative to total words produced, and UM ratio (UM/(UM + UH))

From: Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder

 

Average UM

Average UH

UM ratio

 

Est. (se)

z

p

Est. (se)

z

p

Est. (se)

z

p

Intercept

−4.33 (0.27)

−16.25

< 0.000

−5.98 (.23)

−26.51

< 0.000

−0.14 (.13)

−1.09

0.28

Age

−0.21 (0.16)

−1.38

0.17

−0.15 (0.12)

−1.21

0.23

0.05 (0.08)

−0.58

0.56

GCA

0.08 (0.16)

0.55

0.58

−0.11 (0.12)

−0.95

0.34

−0.04 (0.07)

0.53

0.59

Sex

−0.50 (0.30)

−1.68

0.09

0.82 (0.24)

3.36

< 0.001**

−0.46 (0.15)

−3.18

0.001**

SCQ

0.08 (0.21)

0.37

0.71

−0.02 (0.16)

−0.10

0.92

0.06 (0.11)

0.55

0.58

V Com

−0.12 (0.23)

−0.53

0.60

0.26 (0.17)

1.47

0.14

−0.08 (0.12)

−0.69

0.48

V Soc

0.16 (0.26)

0.62

0.54

−0.69 (0.20)

−3.48

< 0.001**

0.29 (0.13)

2.28

0.02*

  1. Predictors associated with greater dependent variable values have positive log-odds (shown as estimate (Est.) with standard error (se) in parentheses). V Com Vineland Communication Domain scores, V Soc Vineland Socialization Domain scores, Sex 0 = girl, 1 = boy. * p<.05, ** p<.01