Skip to main content

Table 2 Quantification of VEP components and comparison between groups

From: Deletion and duplication of 16p11.2 are associated with opposing effects on visual evoked potential amplitude

 

Control

Deletion

Duplication

Group comparisons

Pairwise comparisons

Good trials

63 (49)

60 (39)

45 (47)

H(2): 0.22, p = 0.894

Latency measurements (ms)

    N1 latency

60 (15)

46 (30)

46 (16)

H(2): 6.85, p= 0.033

Ctr/Del: p = 0.053

Ctr/Dup: p = 0.099

Del/Dup: p = 1.000

    P1 latency

94 (9)

92 (12)

90 (7)

H(2): 1.72, p = 0.422

    N2 latency

164 (71)

164 (44)

152 (81)

H(2): 0.13, p = 0.937

    P1-N2 time

72.0 (66.0)

72.0 (50.0)

72.0 (76.0)

H(2): 0.37, p = 0.858

Amplitude measurements (uV)

    N1 amp

−4.5 (5.1)

−1.2 (5.4)

−3.4 (4.3)

H(2): 3.97, p = 0.137

    P1 amp

10.4 (8.1)

15.7 (11.2)

5.4 (9.5)

H(2): 11.92, p= 0.003

Ctr/Del: p = 0.088

Ctr/Dup: p = 0.628

Del/Dup: p = 0.003

    N2 amp

−0.94 (11.5)

−7.45 (7.3)

−3.19 (7.2)

H(2): 1.55, p = 0.460

    N1-P1 amp

15.0 (17.5)

16.9 (6.1)

8.3 (11.1)

H(2): 6.81, p= 0.033

Ctr/Del: p = 1.000

Ctr/Dup: p = 0.226

Del/Dup: p = 0.028

    P1-N2 amp

12.9 (17.6)

19.7 (16.4)

8.1 (10.3)

H(2): 10.48, p= 0.005

Ctr/Del: p = 0.207

Ctr/Dup: p = 0.455

Del/Dup: p = 0.005

  1. Median values (interquartile range) are reported. Amp: amplitude. Pairwise comparisons with adjusted p values were performed if the overall group comparison was significant (p < 0.05). Significant results are in bold