From: Prevalence of autism in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Year | First author | Region | Sample size | Area | Age (years) | Sample screened | Screen methods | Screen tools | Cut-off | Response rate (%) | P/R | Diagnostic tools | Diagnostic criteria | Childhood autism | ASC prevalence/SE (per 10,000) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | prevalence/SE (per 10,000) |  |
1987 | Tao [37] | Mainland | 457,200 | Urban | 3 to 8 | C | R | - | - | - | R | - | Rutter | 0.32 (0.08) | - |
2000 | Luo [38] | Mainland | 10,802 | Mixed | 2 to 14 | SG | QI | ABC | 31 | 100 | P | - | CCMD-2-R, DSM-III-R | 2.8 (1.60) | - |
2002 | Wang [39] | Mainland | 3.978 | Urban | 2 to 6 | K | QI | CABS | 7 | 98.3 | P | CARS | CCMD-2-R | 17.9 (6.70) | - |
2002 | Ren [40] | Mainland | 3,559 | Urban | 3 to 5 | SG | QI | CABS | 14 | 99.1 | P | - | - | 250 (2.31) | - |
2003 | Wang [41] | Mainland | 7,488 | Mixed | 2 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 7 | 98.08 | P | CARS | CCMD-2-R | 12.3 (4.05) | - |
2003 | Chang [42] | Taiwan | 660 | Mixed | 15 to 93 | C | C | ASDASQ | 5 | 100 | P | - | DSM-IV | - | 60.0 (30.06) |
2004 | Guo [43] | Mainland | 5,000 | Urban | 0 to 6 | WP | QI | CABS | 7 | 99.1 | P | CARS | CCMD-2-R | 10 (4.47) | - |
2004 | Guo [44] | Mainland | 3,776 | Rural | 2 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 7 | 100 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 8 (4.59) | - |
2005 | Zhang [45] | Mainland | 7,416 | Urban | 2 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 7 | 99 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 11.0 (3.85) | - |
2005 | Zhang [46] | Mainland | 1,305 | Urban | 3 to 7 | K | QI | CABS | 14 | 100 | P | - | - | 19.9 (2.47) | - |
2005 | Liu [47] | Mainland | 21,866 | Mixed | 2 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 7 | 100 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 13.4 (2.47) | 15.3 (2.64) |
2007 | Yang [48] | Mainland | 10,412 | Urban | 3 to 12 | PS | QI | ABC | 31 | 100 | P | - | DSM-IV | 5.6 (2.32) | - |
2007 | Wong [49] | Hong Kong | 4,247,206 | Mixed | 0 to 14 | HS | R | - | - | - | R | CARS, ADI-R | DSM-IV | - | 16.1 (0.19) |
2008 | Zhang [36] | Mainland | 8,681 | Urban | 2 to 3 | SG | QI | CHAT | - | 100 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 16.1 (4.3) | - |
2008 | Zhang [36] | Mainland | 12,430 | Urban | 4 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 14 | 100 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 8.85 (2.7) | - |
2009 | Zhang [50] | Mainland | 5,000 | Urban | 0 to 6 | SG | QI | CABS | 7 | 99.98 | P | CARS | CCMD-2-R | 10.0 (4.47) | - |
2009 | Wang [51] | Mainland | 4,156 | Urban | 2 to 6 | K | QI | CABS | 14 | 100 | P | - | - | 19.5 (6.84) | - |
2010 | Li [52] | Mainland | 8,006 | Mixed | 1.5 to 3 | SG | QI | CHAT | - | 92.99 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 26.2 (5.71) | - |
2010 | Wu [53] | Mainland | 8,532 | Urban | 0 to 3 | SG | QI | CHAT | - | 100 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 8.2 (3.10) | - |
2010 | Yu [54] | Mainland | 7,059 | Mixed | 2 to 6 | SG | Q | CABS | 7 | 89.7 | P | - | DSM-IV | 21.2 (5.47) | 22.7 (5.66) |
2010 | Chen [55] | Mainland | 7,034 | Mixed | 2 to 6 | SG | Q | CABS | 7 | 98.78 | P | CARS | DSM-IV | 14.2 (4.49) | 24.2 (5.86) |
2011 | Wang [56] | Mainland | 7,500 | Urban | 2 to 6 | K | QI | CABS | 14 | 87.8 | P | - | DSM-IV | 29.5 (6.26) | 75.4 (9.99) |
2011 | Liang [57] | Mainland | 2,485 | Urban | 3 to 6 | K | QI | CABS | 14 | 100 | P | - | DSM-IV, ICD-10 | 14.1 (7.53) | - |
2011 | Li [58] | Mainland | 616,940 | Mixed | 0 to 17 | SG | QI | ABC | - | - | P | - | ICD-10 | 2.38 (0.20) | - |
2011 | Chien [59] | Taiwan | 372,642 | Mixed | 0 to 17 | HS | R | - | - | - | R | - | ICD-9 | - | 28.7 (0.88) |